Circular No. 5557 Central Bureau for Astronomical Telegrams INTERNATIONAL ASTRONOMICAL UNION Postal Address: Central Bureau for Astronomical Telegrams Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A. Telephone 617-495-7244/7440/7444 (for emergency use only) TWX 710-320-6842 ASTROGRAM CAM EASYLINK 62794505 MARSDEN@CFA or GREEN@CFA (.SPAN, .BITNET or .HARVARD.EDU) COMET MACHHOLZ (1992k) The following additional positions have been reported: 1992 UT R.A. (2000) Decl. m1 Observer July 5.46597 4 57 14.57 +34 42 04.6 9 Helin 5.47523 4 57 16.76 +34 41 44.2 " 6.456 5 01.9 +34 06 9.2 Morris E. Helin, K. Lawrence, L. Lee, and D. Moraru (Palomar). 0.46-m Schmidt telescope. Measurer K. Lawrence. Second film very dark. C. S. Morris (near Mt. Wilson, CA). 0.26-m reflector. Comet well condensed with 1'.8 coma. PSR 0833-45 M. Strickman and J. E. Grove, Naval Research Laboratory; and S. Matz and M. Ulmer, Northwestern University, on behalf of the OSSE team, report: "PSR 0833-45, the Vela pulsar, was observed by the OSSE instrument onboard the Compton Gamma Ray Observatory during the intervals 1991 Aug. 22-Sept. 5, 1992 Apr. 23-28, and May 7- 14. Using radio ephemerides supplied to the Compton instrument teams by J. Taylor et al. (1992, private communication) for the above intervals, OSSE data with 4-ms time resolution were folded at the radio period. The resulting light curves indicate positive detections of the pulsar in the energy bands 0.06-0.17 and 0.20-0.55 MeV, with an overall statistical significance of about 4-sigma distributed over the three observation periods. No significant flux was detected in the energy band 0.69-1.8 MeV, and only a marginally positive flux was observed in the 1.8- to 8.7-MeV band. The phase- averaged pulsed fluxes observed in these energy bands are (3.8 +/- 1.1) x 10E-4, (1.8 +/- 0.5) x 10E-4, (0.1 +/- 2.4) x 10E-5, and (7.1 +/- 3.3) x 10E-6 photons cmE-2 sE-1 MeVE-1, respectively. The fluxes have been derived by fitting a template model to the light curve for each band. The quoted uncertainties are based on counting statistics. The observed light curve generally resembles the light curve at higher gamma-ray energies (e.g., Bennett et al. 1977, A.Ap. 61, 279), consisting of two peaks separated by about 0.45 in phase. The second peak is significantly lower and broader than the primary, and there is no significant interpulse observed. The first peak lags the radio peak by an amount in approximate agreement with observations at higher energies (e.g., Buccheri et al. 1978, A.Ap. 69, 141)." 1992 July 6 (5557) Daniel W. E. Green
Our Web policy. Index to the CBAT/MPC/ICQ pages.