Circular No. 3474 Central Bureau for Astronomical Telegrams INTERNATIONAL ASTRONOMICAL UNION Postal Address: Central Bureau for Astronomical Telegrams Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A. TWX 710-320-6842 ASTROGRAM CAM Telephone 617-864-5758 PERIODIC COMET HONDA-MRKOS-PAJDUSAKOVA (1980c) P. M. Millman, Herzberg Institute of Astrophysics, reports that this comet was independently recovered by I. Halliday with the Canada-France-Hawaii 3.6-m telescope at Mauna Kea as follows: 1980 UT R. A. (1950) Decl. m1 May 7.2500 5 08 03 +16 16.6 14 A 10-min exposure (098-02 emulsion, RG 630 filter) shows a very faint tail ~ 40" long centered on p.a. 70o; two faint streamers 9" long appear in p.a. 30o and 60o. SATELLITES OF SATURN A. Dollfus, Observatoire de Meudon, telexes that a survey for satellites was conducted at Pic du Midi by S. Brunier and himself during Mar. 20-24; 150 exposures covering 17 hours were obtained. 1966 S 2, with period 0.69468 day (cf. IAUC 3463), which is in accord with a reanalysis of most of the observations originally attributed to Saturn X (Janus), was observed on 13 exposures between Mar. 23.886 and 23.990 UT with maximum eastern elongation on Mar. 23.925 +/- 0.002; mag ~ 14. Another satellite, designated 1980 S 19, mag ~ 15, was simultaneously seen detached from the ring, with maximum western elongation on Mar. 23.882 +/- 0.005 at 2.55 Rs (Saturn equatorial radii) from Saturn; a period of 0.712 day fits with 1980 S 3, S 4 and S 5. Another faint object, 1980 S 20, was seen on six exposures between Mar. 20.899 (1.9 Rs east) and 20.922 (2.20 RS east). A dubious object, 1980 S 21, was suspected on four exposures around Mar. 22.98 at 2.2 Rs west. Another dubious object, 1980 S 22, fainter than mag 16, was suggested on four exposures between Mar. 20.885 (5.89 Rs west) and 20.978 (5.25 Rs west). PROBABLE OCCULTATION BY 1978 P 1 R. S. Harrington, U.S. Naval Observatory, writes that analysis of exposures on Apr. 13 and 20 by C. C. Dahn and J. W. Christy with the 1.5-m reflector and 0.2-m astrograph indicates that at the time of the observed occultation associated with Pluto on Apr. 6 (cf IAUC 3466) the star was ~ 0".5 west and 0".9 north of Pluto. 1978 P 1 was predicted to be 0".1 west and 0".9 north, supporting the conclusion that the occultation was caused by the satellite. 1980 May 9 (3474) Brian G. Marsden
Our Web policy. Index to the CBAT/MPC/ICQ pages.