Circular No. 3431 Central Bureau for Astronomical Telegrams INTERNATIONAL ASTRONOMICAL UNION Postal Address: Central Bureau for Astronomical Telegrams Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory, Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A. TWX 710-320-6842 ASTROGRAM CAM Telephone 617-864-5758 OCCULTATION OF AGK3 +0 1022 BY (3) JUNO R. Elliott, University of Wisconsin, reports a positive photoelectric observation of this event (BAA Handbook for 1979, p. 26) as follows: disappearance, Dec. 11d09h00m21s +/- 1s UT; reappearance, 11d09h01m28s; Long. = +91o29'57".66, Lat. = +44o47'44".42, h = 268 m. M. Bicay and S. Donnell assisted. Conditions were gpod but somewhat hazy. No secondary events were detected during 8h57m-9h03m UT. W. Osborn, Central Michigan University, also reports a positive photoelectric observation: disappearance, Dec. 11d08h58m31s +/- 2s UT; reappearance, 11d08h59m49s; Long. = +84o46'28".3, Lat. = +43o35'15".3, h = 258 m. Conditions were quite good but with scattered clouds. The magnitude drop was ~ 0.7. A secondary event lasting 2s at Dec. 11d09h01m37s UT is believed to be instrumental in origin. THE DOUBLE QUASAR Q0957+561 J. E. Gunn, J. Kristian, J. B. Oke, J. A. Westphal and P. J. Young, Hale Observatories, report further evidence that this object is formed by a gravitational lens. The intervening galaxy is the brightest member of a rich cluster, seen on a deep red CCD exposure taken at the 5-m telescope. The galaxy has a total magnitude of 18.5 and is centered 0".75 north of the southern QSO component, Q0957+561B. Multichannel spectrophotometry of the two QSO images shows a galaxy component in the spectrum of Q0957+561B, with a redshift of 0.4. Detailed calculations of the gravitational-lens effect, based on models for both the galaxy and the cluster, lead to a prediction that the southern QSO image, Q0957+561B, may itself be double, with a separation below the resolution of existing data. Some models predict a separation of 0".2 and a brightness ratio of ~ 1.6, with the brighter component to the south. Other observers using higher-resolution techniques (VLBI, speckle interferometry, etc.) are urged to examine their data for the possible detection of this effect. CORRIGENDA IAUC 3416, PKS 2155 and Cygnus X-2. Lines 4-3 from the foot should read: "539), the 150-nm flux was ~ 10**-16 J m**-2 s**-1 nm**-1, while on Oct. 15.7 UT, at phase 0.6, it was hardly detectable over the background. Several". IAUC 3429, 1979 VA, line 19. For 0.4-cm read 0.4-m. 1979 December 14 (3431) Brian G. Marsden
Our Web policy. Index to the CBAT/MPC/ICQ pages.